THE
RATTLE SNAKE
Piano competitions have been proliferating
for decades, providing opportunities
for young artists to display their
talent and, in some rare cases, to
jumpstart important careers. However,
a new phenomenon forcefully entered
the circuit: piano competitions for
amateurs.
To me, the word ‘amateur’ doesn’t
inspire trust. I’ve always
attributed a not-so-positive connotation
to it, and it seems that labeling
someone an amateur implies accepting
the fact that that person may love
music, but the quality is not quite
there simply because they are musicians
who do not make a living by teaching
and/or performing. In some cases,
that is not true at all. The quality
is very much there, only they are
doctors, lawyers, writers, limousine
drivers…
Pianists from all over the world
fly to Fort Worth, Boston, Berlin
and other cities to compete in what
I would describe as a rather vain
proposition: while it becomes almost
inevitable for a young artist to
participate in competitions to possibly
open doors to a career, these opportunities
are created for individuals who do
not intend to develop one, with prizes
and rewards that do not live up to
the standards of the major international
competitions.
Several years ago, I was invited
to sit on the panel of the Boston
Piano Amateur Competition. I was
looking forward to spending time
with four really lovely colleagues
of mine and listen to some truly
talented pianists from all over the
world. In some cases, their playing
was of a very high level: I believe
not coincidentally, those pianists
were the ones that had some formal
training and some true sense of both
technical command and style.
One of them, possibly among the youngest,
played with confidence but with a
complete lack of imagination and
a limited range of sonorities, which
unfortunately prevented him from
placing high enough... to make his
wife happy. And by that I mean… a
complete act of submission: after
the award ceremony that concluded
the event, his wife, who claimed
to be an opera singer, came to talk
to me, while her husband was quietly
standing behind her, the woman becoming
at the same time a protective shield
and a security blanket.
The scene opened with a woman approaching
me on stage, impatiently waiting
for me to wrap up a conversation
with another contestant. Even though
I had no idea who she was, I noticed
her presence for her considerable
height and long flowing hair. When
I was done, she stepped forward and
I noticed who I thought was her husband
swiftly joining her. I still didn’t
know what they had programmed.
“Hello, I’m the wife
of ----- -----, and I would like
to talk to you. First of all, my
husband and I are very disappointed
about the results. I mean… don’t
you think it’s unreasonable?
He should have placed much higher!
I mean… didn’t you hear
the audience’s reaction to
his performance? He got the loudest
applause!” Taken by surprise,
the only thing I could think was “WHY
ME???” while the volume of
her voice kept rising, her accusations
becoming more and more arrogant.
“I mean… You guys should
know better!!! SUPPOSEDLY (!!!),
you are professionals! I can’t
believe you are unable to hear a
thing! I mean… my husband
played so much better than the other
contestants! What were you thinking!!!
I can’t believe this is happening,
and I’ll hold you responsible
for this! This is just unacceptable!
Didn’t you hear the way the
audience reacted? The way they clapped
after my husband finished?” Meanwhile,
her husband was semi-hiding behind
her, not saying a word. For a split
second, I had this nightmarish vision
that she would turn into a gigantic
rattle snake in slow motion, pulling
out her fangs and biting me to death.
While she was insulting me and the
others on the panel and screaming
at the top of her lungs, I was just
standing there, determined to have
something constructive for her husband,
and I suspected slightly more polite
as well. Some people surrounding
us had already noticed the commotion.
I let her angry tirade wind down.
I remember her spiel ending with “so,
what do you have to say to that?” I
still believe that the reason why
she attacked ME and not the other
jurors is because her husband was
about my age and they thought they
would have a better chance of directing
bitter remarks to someone belonging
to their age group.
My reply was at first quite gentle. “Firstly,
I don’t mind talking to your
husband about his performance, which
certainly was accomplished, alas
not at the same level of other contestants.
However, I have no intention to talk
to you unless you change your tone,
and unless it is to clarify why your
husband didn’t place. And in
a way, I think it would be better
if your husband participated in the
conversation, too, don’t you
think?” at which, he nodded
and stepped forward, just enough
to appear as if he were engaged in
the conversation.
“Secondly, let me remind you
that there’s no reason to insult
us: I believe we were asked to be
on the panel because we are professional
pianists. Let me remind you that
you are not, so I believe we know
a thing or two more than you do”
The woman resigned after that, moving
to the side and letting her husband
be in the foreground. I then directed
my words to the man: “I was
quite impressed with your playing.
However, I do think it would benefit
from a wider range of dynamics. Also,
I think you tend to give us a very
monochromatic approach to characters.
I’m referring specifically
to the more aggressive, edgy, fierce
moments… I think there wasn’t
enough 'bite'. Maybe… you
could learn a thing or two from your
wife…?”
|